Board of Inquiry (BOI) Defense Lawyer
A Board of Inquiry is the most consequential administrative proceeding a commissioned officer can face. Your career, retirement, characterization of service, and professional reputation are on the line. Korody Law has represented officers at BOIs across every branch of service — from O-1s to flag and general officers — at installations and bases worldwide. Our attorneys bring over 70 combined years of JAG and military defense experience to every case. We specialize in senior officer misconduct defense.
If you have received notice of a Board of Inquiry or a "show cause" recommendation from your command, deadlines begin running immediately. Statements made before consulting counsel, rights waived inadvertently, and documents signed without review can permanently harm your case. Contact Korody Law before you respond to anything.
On This Page
- What Is a Board of Inquiry (BOI)?
- BOI vs. Administrative Separation Board — Key Differences
- Who Faces a BOI and Why It Happens
- What Is at Stake in a Board of Inquiry
- How the BOI Process Works — Step by Step
- Branch-Specific BOI Regulations
- What a Board of Inquiry Defense Lawyer Does
- Korody Law's BOI Defense Strategy
- How to Choose a BOI Defense Attorney
- Case Results
- Client Testimonials
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Related Practice Areas
What Is a Board of Inquiry (BOI)?
A Board of Inquiry (BOI) is a formal administrative hearing convened by the military to determine whether a commissioned officer should be retained in service or separated — and, if separated, on what terms. It is the officer's equivalent of an administrative separation board and is governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice framework, service-specific regulations, and Department of Defense instructions.
The BOI process is initiated when a Show Cause Authority (SCA) — typically a general or flag officer — determines that there is sufficient basis to require an officer to "show cause for retention." The officer is notified in writing and given an opportunity to respond before a formal board is convened. At the board itself, a panel of at least three officers hears evidence and argument, then issues findings and recommendations to the convening authority.
Despite being administrative rather than criminal, a BOI can be every bit as career-ending as a court-martial. The record created at a BOI follows the officer for life — it can drive separation decisions, retirement grade determinations, future promotion boards, security clearance adjudications, and civilian employment. There is no "just an admin action" when a BOI is involved.
Bottom line: A Board of Inquiry is not a routine personnel matter. It is a formal evidentiary proceeding where evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and the entire trajectory of an officer's career can be decided in a single day. Treat it like litigation — because it effectively is.
Officers facing BOIs are entitled to have counsel — including civilian defense counsel of their own choosing, at their own expense. They are also entitled to be represented by assigned military defense counsel (a JAG officer). However, experienced civilian military defense lawyers bring a level of depth, preparation, and independent advocacy that detailed military counsel — often junior JAGs with limited board experience — simply cannot match.
BOI vs. Administrative Separation Board — Key Differences
Both a Board of Inquiry and an Administrative Separation Board (ADSEP board) are adversarial hearings that can result in involuntary separation. But they apply to different populations and operate under different regulatory frameworks. Understanding the distinction is essential to building the right defense.
| Factor | Board of Inquiry (BOI) | Admin Separation Board (ADSEP) |
|---|---|---|
| Who it applies to | Commissioned officers (O-1 and above) | Enlisted service members (E-1 to E-9) |
| Governing authority | DODI 1332.30; service-specific regs (e.g., SECNAVINST 1920.6D) | DODI 1332.14; service-specific regs (e.g., MILPERSMAN 1910) |
| Entitlement to hearing | Board required only at 6+ years commissioned service or when OTH is sought | Board required only at 6+ years total service or when OTH is sought |
| Panel composition | At least 3 commissioned officers senior to respondent | At least 3 members; enlisted member often included in enlisted boards |
| Characterizations available | Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), Other Than Honorable | Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), Other Than Honorable |
| Retirement implications | Board may recommend retirement grade — critical for retirement-eligible officers | Board may recommend retirement grade — critical for retirement-eligible members |
| Post-board review | Show Cause Authority reviews + separation authority review; BCMR/BCNR for correction of records | Separation authority review; BCMR/BCNR for correction of records |
If you are enlisted and facing separation, see our dedicated Administrative Separation Board defense page. This page focuses exclusively on the BOI process and officer defense.
Who Faces a BOI — Common Triggers and Fact Patterns
BOIs can arise from a remarkably wide range of allegations, conduct issues, and command climate concerns. No two cases are identical, but certain patterns appear repeatedly. Understanding what triggers a BOI — and how those triggers translate into specific legal and evidentiary issues — is the foundation of effective defense.
Official Grounds (Per Regulation)
- UCMJ misconduct (any offense that could warrant a punitive discharge if tried by court-martial)
- Civilian criminal conviction or adverse civilian court action
- Drug abuse — including positive urinalysis, use, possession, or facilitation
- Substandard performance of duty — including failure to meet standards
- Moral or professional dereliction — conduct unbecoming, fraternization, ethics violations
- Loss of professional qualifications, licenses, or security clearance
- Failure to participate (reserve/Guard component officers)
- Sexual misconduct or sexual harassment findings
- Command climate failures — "loss of confidence in ability to command"
Common Real-World Fact Patterns
- NCIS, CID, or OSI investigation concluded — no court-martial, but BOI initiated
- Positive urinalysis result (THC, cocaine, opioids, amphetamines)
- Sexual assault allegation — acquittal at court-martial may still trigger BOI
- Sexual harassment finding by command investigation
- NJP/Article 15 or formal reprimand (GOMOR/LOR) in record
- Civilian DUI arrest or conviction
- Financial misconduct, fraud, or abuse of government resources
- Adverse fitness report (FITREP/OER) patterns
- Substantiated IG complaint against officer
- Alcohol-related incidents, DUI, public intoxication
- Theft or misappropriation of government property
Important: An acquittal at court-martial does not prevent a BOI from being initiated on the same underlying facts. The standard of proof is lower at a BOI (preponderance of evidence vs. beyond a reasonable doubt), and the government can use evidence that may have been excluded at a criminal trial. Do not assume that a favorable court-martial outcome protects you from a BOI.
Branches We Serve
What Is at Stake in a Board of Inquiry
Officers who minimize the severity of a BOI often regret it. The consequences of an adverse outcome are not limited to separation — they cascade across nearly every dimension of your professional and financial life. Here is what is genuinely on the line:
Career Termination
Involuntary separation ends your military career permanently. Even a "retained" finding can include career-limiting adverse findings that block future promotions, prestigious billets, and command assignments. A separation narrative reason can follow you into federal civilian employment and contractor work.
Retirement Eligibility & Grade
Officers at or near 20 years of service risk losing retirement benefits entirely — or being retired in a reduced grade. For retirement-eligible officers, a retirement grade determination at a lower rank or pay grade can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost pension payments over the course of retirement. Investing in experienced BOI defense counsel is, in these cases, among the most financially sound decisions an officer can make.
Characterization of Service
An Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge can strip VA healthcare, GI Bill benefits, home loan eligibility, and other federal benefits. It can also bar you from certain professional licenses, government security clearances, and civilian employment. Fighting for an Honorable or General characterization of service is not merely symbolic — it has profound and lasting financial consequences.
Security Clearance
An adverse BOI outcome — particularly misconduct findings or an OTH characterization of service — can trigger security clearance revocation or denial proceedings. Officers with Top Secret/SCI clearances who transition to defense contracting can lose six-figure post-military careers if their clearance is compromised. The BOI record becomes evidence in clearance adjudications. (Security clearance defense →)
Reputation & Narrative
The narrative reason for separation on your DD-214 is public. It is reviewed by civilian employers, federal hiring authorities, licensing boards, and law enforcement agencies. An adverse narrative ("misconduct — sexual harassment," for example) is extraordinarily difficult to explain or overcome. Controlling the narrative reason is a core defense objective.
Professional Licenses
Officers who are also licensed physicians, nurses, attorneys, engineers, or pilots can face licensing board inquiries triggered by a BOI outcome. Medical and nursing boards often require disclosure of adverse military action. A BOI outcome that might seem survivable in a military context can have devastating secondary effects on a professional license.
How the BOI Process Works — Step by Step
The BOI process varies somewhat by branch, but the essential structure is consistent across the services. Understanding each phase — and where defense opportunities exist — is critical to building an effective strategy.
-
Show Cause Referral & Notice
The Show Cause Authority (SCA) — typically a General or Flag Officer (GOFO) — reviews allegations, investigative reports, and command input and makes an initial determination that an officer should "show cause for retention." The officer receives written notice specifying the factual basis, the regulatory grounds, and the officer's rights. This is your first opportunity to influence the process. Responding strategically — or declining to respond — requires immediate legal counsel. In some branches, you may be able to submit a written response to the SCA before any board is convened, potentially stopping the process entirely.
-
Officer's Elections & Early Response
Upon receipt of notice, the officer makes formal elections — exercising or waiving rights to appear, present witnesses, and request a board. These elections have lasting legal consequences. You should never sign election paperwork without first consulting with counsel. Some elections cannot be revoked. Others that appear routine (such as requesting specific witnesses) may trigger procedural deadlines that constrain your later options.
-
Counsel Assignment & Case Development
After elections are filed, military defense counsel (a JAG officer) is assigned from the appropriate regional defense office. The officer may simultaneously retain civilian counsel. This pre-hearing phase is where outcomes are most profoundly shaped. Your legal team should be gathering all relevant records, identifying favorable witnesses, requesting government evidence, assessing procedural defects, and developing the theory of the case — well before the hearing date is set.
-
Pre-Hearing Preparation
The weeks before the BOI are intensive. Your legal team prepares cross-examination outlines for government witnesses, prepares your witnesses for direct examination, assembles supporting exhibits (performance records, awards, leadership assessments, expert reports), drafts any motions or objections to evidence, and prepares you — if you are going to testify — for the witness stand. Officers who appear at their BOI unprepared often create a worse record than the government's evidence alone would have.
-
The BOI Hearing
The hearing itself typically unfolds in a single day, though complex cases may take longer. The Recorder (government's presenting officer) presents evidence and examines witnesses. Defense counsel cross-examines government witnesses and presents the defense case — evidence, witnesses, and argument. The officer may testify or decline to testify. Objections are raised and ruled on. Following evidence presentation, both sides typically make closing argument. The board deliberates privately and issues findings and recommendations.
-
Findings & Board Recommendations
The board issues written findings on each alleged basis (typically "substantiated" or "not substantiated") and recommends either retention or separation. If separation is recommended, the board specifies a characterization of service. For retirement-eligible officers, the board may also recommend a retirement grade. These recommendations are not final — they go to the Show Cause Authority and ultimately the Separation Authority for final action.
-
Post-Board Review & Final Action
After the hearing, the record is reviewed by the convening authority and, in most cases, the Separation Authority (often the Secretary of the applicable branch). The officer may have an opportunity to submit additional material (sometimes called a "letter of deficiency" or "post-board submission") identifying errors or injustices in the record. In certain cases, further review — including through the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR/BCNR), the Physical Disability Board of Review, or federal court — is available. A clean hearing record is the foundation for all post-board remedies.
Branch-Specific BOI Regulations — What Governs Your Case
The BOI process is shaped by the branch in which you serve. Each service has its own implementing regulations, forms, and procedural customs — though all operate within the framework of DODI 1332.30. Knowing the applicable regulations is not optional; it is the starting point for identifying errors, protecting rights, and building a procedurally sound defense.
| Branch | Primary BOI Regulation | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Navy | SECNAVINST 1920.6D; MILPERSMAN 1920 | CNO/SECNAV as final separation authority for many cases; retirement grade decided by Secretary |
| U.S. Marine Corps | SECNAVINST 1920.6D (shared with Navy); MCO governing boards | Commandant's office involved in senior officer BOIs; strong command climate emphasis |
| U.S. Army | AR 600-8-24; AR 635-100 | Army Human Resources Command (HRC) plays central role; elimination board structure |
| U.S. Air Force / Space Force | AFI 36-3206 | Show cause process managed through Air Force Personnel Center; retention board distinct from elimination |
| U.S. Coast Guard | COMDTINST M1000.6 (series) | Coast Guard uses similar board structure; Commandant as final authority for flag officer cases |
| National Guard / Reserve | NGB guidance + applicable active component regulation | State adjutant general involvement; federal recognition implications; dual-status complexity |
Regulatory compliance is not a technicality — it is a defense tool. Procedural defects in the initiation, notice, or conduct of a BOI can be preserved as grounds for post-board relief. An experienced BOI defense attorney reads the applicable regulation in detail and holds the government to its own rules.
What a Board of Inquiry Defense Lawyer Does
Effective BOI representation is not about showing up on hearing day and making an argument. It is a sustained, strategic effort that begins the moment notice is received and continues through post-board review. Here is what a skilled BOI defense attorney does at each stage:
Pre-Hearing: Case Architecture
- Theory of the case: Developing the governing narrative before the government frames the issues
- Evidence audit: Reviewing all government evidence for foundation, relevance, reliability, and admissibility issues
- Records requests: Obtaining investigative reports, command records, medical/psychological evaluations, and prior proceedings
- Witness strategy: Identifying, vetting, and preparing witnesses who can advance retention findings
- Expert consultation: Engaging forensic experts (toxicology, digital forensics, psychology) where allegations depend on technical evidence
- Mitigation development: Building a mitigation package tailored to BOI decision criteria — not generic character letters
- Procedural review: Identifying defects in notice, convening authority, referral basis, or timelines
At the Hearing: Advocacy
- Opening statement: Framing the board's decision before the first piece of evidence is introduced
- Cross-examination: Challenging the credibility, bias, and reliability of government witnesses
- Evidence objections: Objecting to improper, unreliable, or prejudicial evidence — and preserving those objections in the record
- Direct examination: Eliciting favorable testimony from defense witnesses in a structured, persuasive manner
- Officer preparation: Preparing the officer to testify (or deciding, strategically, not to) and preventing harmful admissions
- Closing argument: Synthesizing evidence and applying legal standards to reach the finding you need
Post-Hearing: Record Preservation & Review
- Drafting post-board submissions (letters of deficiency)
- Advising on separation authority review submissions
- Pursuing BCMR/BCNR petitions where board findings were erroneous
- Preserving the record for future promotion boards and fighting to ensure your official military personnel record stays clean
- Coordinating with federal litigation counsel where judicial review is warranted
Korody Law's BOI Defense Strategy
We do not approach BOIs with a generic playbook. Every officer's situation is different — the allegations, the evidence, the branch, the career trajectory, and the personal stakes all vary. But our strategic framework is consistent: control the record, frame the issues, and build a defense that is credible to the specific decision-makers who will read it.
1. Narrative Control
Well in advance of the board, we work to shape its outcome — it is critical to contact us when notified, as the battle on your behalf begins then. BOIs are won by narrowing what the board is actually deciding. The government will try to frame the proceeding as broadly as possible. We work to define the issues precisely, limit the scope of findings to what the evidence actually supports, and build a counter-narrative that explains — without conceding — the facts the government presents. Our primary goal is always a finding of no misconduct or no basis. Only when that is not achievable do we shift focus to retention or a favorable characterization of service. Officers who let the government frame the case without early resistance almost always lose.
2. Evidence Architecture
We conduct a thorough review of all government evidence — investigative reports, statements, scientific testing results, digital evidence, and witness accounts. We challenge foundation, chain of custody, methodology, and bias. Simultaneously, we build the defense evidentiary record: performance evaluations, awards, command endorsements, subject-matter experts, and rebuttal witnesses. The goal is a record that supports a finding of no misconduct or no basis — or, at minimum, retention or a favorable characterization of service.
3. Mitigation That Matters
Generic character letters rarely move BOI panels. We build mitigation that speaks the language of the board: combat deployments, leadership impact, documented corrective action, service needs, command support, and demonstrated rehabilitation. Mitigation that reaches the board as credible, specific, and grounded in documented record — not emotional appeals — is what shapes outcomes.
4. Cross-Examination
Many BOI Recorders rely on documentary evidence and investigative reports without rigorous cross-examination preparation. Our attorneys develop cross-examination themes well in advance and execute them with precision — exposing inconsistencies, bias, chain-of-custody failures, and investigative shortcuts that undermine the reliability of government evidence.
5. Insider Knowledge
Our attorneys have served as JAG officers — including as Recorders at BOIs, as military judges, as advisors to Show Cause Authorities, and in reviewing post-BOI submissions. We know how these boards deliberate, what evidence they find persuasive, and where the procedural pressure points are. That institutional knowledge is not something a generalist attorney can approximate.
6. Record Preservation
Even in cases we win outright, we preserve the record for future promotion boards and fight to ensure your official military personnel record stays clean. Objections are stated clearly and specifically. Procedural defects are identified and documented. The post-hearing record is the foundation for any review-board petition, BCMR/BCNR submission, or federal court action. An attorney who doesn't think about the appellate record from day one is leaving remedies on the table.
How to Choose a BOI Defense Attorney
Not every military or civilian defense attorney is equipped to handle a Board of Inquiry. BOI defense requires a specific combination of knowledge, skills, and experience that few military or civilian attorneys possess. When selecting counsel, ask the following questions — and evaluate the answers carefully.
Questions to Ask Any BOI Attorney
- How many BOIs have you personally handled as lead defense counsel?
- What is your success rate of no-misconduct findings or retention outcomes?
- Have you represented officers in my branch of service?
- Have you handled a case involving this type of allegation (drug use, sexual misconduct, financial, etc.)?
- Do you have JAG experience — as a military attorney or military judge — or only civilian military law experience?
- Have you ever served as a Recorder at a BOI or Show Cause Authority advisor?
- How do you approach pre-hearing case development, and what does that process look like?
- Do you handle post-board review proceedings (BCMR/BCNR, federal litigation)?
- Can you provide references from former officer clients in similar situations?
Why Korody Law
- 70+ years combined JAG experience — not general practice lawyers doing occasional military cases
- Our attorneys have served as Recorders, military judges, Show Cause Authority advisors, and post-BOI submission reviewers — we know the system from the inside
- We have represented officers facing the most serious allegation types: sexual assault, drug use, financial fraud, leadership failures, and loss of confidence — and won cases most would have lost
- We represent officers at every rank, from O-1 to flag and general officers, across all branches worldwide
- We specialize in senior officer misconduct defense
- We have represented clients at dozens of installations and bases worldwide and are experienced in remote/virtual case coordination
- Our track record of outright no-misconduct findings, retention outcomes, and favorable characterizations of service speaks for itself
- For retirement-eligible officers, a retirement grade determination at a lower rank or pay grade can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of retirement — investing in Korody Law is a wise and measurable financial decision
Selected BOI Case Results
The following are representative outcomes in Board of Inquiry proceedings handled by Korody Law attorneys. Results depend on the facts, evidence, and board composition in each case. Past results do not guarantee any particular outcome in a future case.
Retained
Sexual assault allegations — officer retained following acquittal at court-martial and subsequent BOI initiation on same underlying facts.
Retained
Drug use — positive urinalysis for cocaine. Officer retained; no adverse characterization of service.
No Misconduct
Sexual harassment finding — board found no basis following rigorous cross-examination of investigative witnesses. Officer returned to duty.
Honorable Discharge
Theft / financial misconduct. Avoided OTH; officer separated with full Honorable characterization of service preserving VA and retirement benefits.
Retained / Current Grade
Retirement-eligible officer — alcohol-related incident. Retained in current grade; full retirement benefits preserved.
Processing Withdrawn
Multiple alleged UCMJ violations — show cause proceedings withdrawn prior to BOI convening following defense submission to SCA.
Past results do not guarantee any particular result in a future case. All cases are dependent upon the evidence, the board members, and the quality of legal representation. Results noted above have been selected for illustrative purposes and do not represent all matters handled by the firm.
What Our Clients Say
"Mr. Korody is by far one of the most talented and experienced military defense attorneys in the country. Every document, every conversation, every procedure, every single regulation will be scrutinized ten times. This man is a consummate professional and is a master of his craft."
— Former Navy Officer, BOI Defense Client"With my case Mr. Korody built such an aggressive defense that the prosecutor recommended to my Commander the day before the board that I be retained and my administrative separation board be cancelled immediately."
— Service Member, Administrative Defense Client"I had been told by multiple people that my case was unwinnable. Korody Law proved them wrong. The preparation they put into my case was unlike anything I had seen in 18 years of military service. They left nothing on the table."
— Marine Corps Officer, BOI Defense Client"The day of the administrative separation board, the outcome found me NOT GUILTY by a unanimous vote. I am now free to continue my military career. Hiring Korody Law was the best decision I made throughout the entire process."
— Service Member, Administrative Defense ClientFacing a Board of Inquiry? Act Now.
The earlier you engage experienced counsel, the more options you have. Deadlines are short, rights can be waived inadvertently, and early strategic decisions shape every subsequent phase of the proceeding. Contact Korody Law for a confidential consultation today.
Frequently Asked Questions
These are the questions we hear most frequently from officers who have just received BOI notice. If your question is not answered here, call or text us directly at (904) 383-7261.
-
No. A Board of Inquiry is an administrative proceeding, not a criminal trial. There is no criminal conviction, no federal criminal record, and no possibility of confinement. However, the consequences of an adverse BOI outcome can be equally severe: involuntary separation, retirement grade reduction, OTH characterization of service, and long-term professional harm. The lower standard of proof at a BOI (preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt) also means the government can succeed on evidence that would have failed at court-martial.
-
Yes — and you should strongly consider it. Officers facing a BOI are entitled to be represented by both their assigned military defense counsel and a civilian attorney of their choosing, at their own expense. Experienced civilian military defense attorneys bring a level of preparation, strategic depth, and independent advocacy that detail counsel — often junior JAG officers handling many cases simultaneously — typically cannot provide. The investment in civilian counsel for a BOI is one of the highest-return decisions an officer can make.
-
The BOI's recommendation is reviewed by the Show Cause Authority (the GOFO who initiated the proceeding) and then forwarded to the Separation Authority — typically the Secretary of the applicable branch. That authority makes the final decision. The officer may have an opportunity to submit a post-board response identifying errors or injustices in the record before the final decision is made. If the separation decision is adverse, further remedies may be available through the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR/BCNR) or, in rare cases, federal court.
-
Yes, an Other Than Honorable (OTH) characterization of service is possible at a BOI — though it is not the most common outcome. The government must establish a basis for OTH, and the defense has significant room to contest characterization even in cases where some basis for separation is found. Fighting for Honorable or General characterization of service — even when separation appears unavoidable — is a critical defense objective that protects VA benefits, retirement benefits (in some circumstances), and long-term professional reputation.
-
Timelines vary significantly by branch, installation, and caseload. From the time the officer receives a show cause notice, the process to an actual BOI hearing is typically several months — often three to six months, sometimes longer. For officers approaching retirement eligibility, the timeline can create additional urgency and strategic complexity. Regardless of the timeline, early legal engagement is essential — the pre-hearing phase is where defense work is most impactful.
-
Preserve every document related to the matter. Do not make any statements — oral or written — about the subject matter of the BOI without first consulting counsel. Do not sign your election paperwork without legal advice. Identify any witnesses who may be favorable to your case and take steps to preserve their availability. And contact a civilian military defense attorney as soon as possible — do not wait for your assigned JAG counsel to reach out first.
-
No. You have a right against self-incrimination and cannot be compelled to testify at your BOI. The decision whether to testify is one of the most consequential strategic decisions in any BOI defense. Testifying can allow you to humanize your case and address the board directly — but it also opens you to cross-examination and potential harmful admissions. This decision should be made carefully with your counsel, based on the specific facts and posture of your case.
-
Yes. A court-martial acquittal does not bar subsequent administrative action on the same underlying allegations. The BOI is a separate proceeding with a different standard of proof (preponderance of evidence vs. beyond a reasonable doubt), and evidence that was excluded from the court-martial may be admissible at the BOI. Officers who prevailed at court-martial sometimes mistakenly believe the matter is resolved — only to be blindsided by a BOI referral months later. If you were acquitted or had charges dropped, do not assume the matter is over.
-
The impact on retirement depends on years of service, grade, and the specific findings. Officers with fewer than 20 years of service generally forfeit retirement eligibility upon involuntary separation (absent disability retirement eligibility). Officers at or beyond 20 years may face a retirement grade determination — meaning the BOI can recommend a retirement grade lower than the officer's current grade, resulting in a significant permanent reduction in monthly retirement pay. For retirement-eligible officers, a grade determination at a lower rank or pay grade can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost pension payments over the course of retirement. Investing in experienced BOI defense counsel is, in these cases, among the most financially sound decisions an officer can make.
-
Yes. We represent Reserve and National Guard officers across all components and states. Reserve and Guard BOI proceedings can involve additional complexity, including federal recognition implications, state adjutant general involvement, and dual-status issues. Our attorneys are experienced navigating this complexity and can advise on both the federal and state dimensions of Reserve/Guard officer proceedings.
Worldwide BOI Representation
Korody Law is based in Jacksonville, Florida — home to Naval Station Mayport, Naval Air Station Jacksonville, and Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay. But our representation extends to officers stationed at every major installation and base in the United States and overseas. We routinely handle cases across all time zones and coordinate remotely where necessary. A BOI defense does not require your attorney to be stationed next door. It requires your attorney to be prepared.
We have represented officers at installations and bases including: Naval Station Norfolk, Camp Lejeune, Naval Base San Diego, Naval Submarine Base Groton, Naval Station Newport, Naval Air Station Pensacola, Fort Stewart, Fort Bragg, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Camp Pendleton, Naval Hospital Portsmouth, Naval Submarine Base Bangor, Naval Station Bremerton, Joint Base Fort Lewis-McCord, Eglin Air Force Base, Washington Navy Yard, Marine Corps Base Quantico, Fort Belvoir, MacDill Air Force Base, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Patrick Air Force Base, Hurlburt Field, Keesler Air Force Base, Marine Corps Base Okinawa, and installations across Europe, the Middle East, and the Pacific.
Distance is not a barrier to experienced representation. If you are stationed OCONUS, on deployment, or at a remote installation, contact us. We will find a way to build your defense.
Your Career Is Worth Fighting For.
Korody Law has represented officers at Boards of Inquiry across every branch of service — including cases that most attorneys would have declined. We specialize in senior officer misconduct defense and approach every BOI as the high-stakes litigation event it is. If you have received BOI or show cause notice, or if you believe a BOI may be coming, contact us today for a confidential consultation. There is no cost to speak with us about your situation.
Korody Law, P.A. · 630 West Adams Street, Suite 208, Jacksonville, FL 32204 · Worldwide Representation