Merchant Mariner Credential Denied for Old Sex Offense Conviction: What the Law Now Says & How to Fight Back

When the U.S. Coast Guard denies a Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC), it can instantly end a maritime career. In recent years, these denials have increased sharply—especially for mariners with decades-old criminal convictions involving sexual offenses. This article explains a real-world denial scenario, what the current law actually requires, and the only viable legal paths available to challenge a mandatory MMC denial.

Why the Coast Guard Is Now Issuing Mandatory MMC Denials

In 2023, the Coast Guard issued CG-MMC Policy Letter 03-23, implementing 46 U.S.C. § 7511(a). This law now requires that an MMC shall be denied if the applicant has been convicted of:

• Any offense listed in Chapter 109A of Title 18 (federal sexual abuse offenses), or
• Any state conviction deemed “substantially similar” to a Chapter 109A offense

Unlike other criminal history provisions in the MMC regulations, this statute does not allow any discretionary waiver. If the conviction qualifies under § 7511(a), the Coast Guard takes the position that it must deny the credential—regardless of:

• How long ago the conviction occurred
• The applicant’s rehabilitation
• Prior credential approvals
• Current union employment
• Decades of safe maritime service

This represents a dramatic shift in how historical convictions are now treated across the maritime industry.

How a Previously Approved Mariner Was Suddenly Denied

In the case underlying this article, a professional mariner:

• Had a single state conviction from 2004 at age 21
• Had no further criminal history for more than 20 years
• Held a valid MMC for years
• Was approved again by the Coast Guard in 2022
• Remains actively employed through a national maritime union

Yet in 2025, the National Maritime Center denied the renewal solely because the 2004 conviction was now being classified as “substantially similar” to a Chapter 109A offense under the new mandatory-denial statute. There was no allegation of new misconduct, no safety violation, and no current risk determination—only a change in how the law is being applied.

Why Rehabilitation Alone No Longer Saves Your License

Before § 7511(a), mariners could often overcome criminal history through:

• Demonstrated rehabilitation
• Clean employment history
• Union verification
• Training, certifications, and safe service records

Under the current statute and Coast Guard policy, rehabilitation alone is legally irrelevant once the offense is classified as a qualifying sexual offense. The denial becomes automatic and non-discretionary at the agency level.

This is why many mariners are now being denied despite having already been licensed for years.

So Is an MMC Denial Under § 7511(a) the End of the Road?

No—but the battlefield changes. When a denial is mandatory by statute, the fight shifts away from discretionary waiver and into high-level legal challenges.

There are now only four realistic avenues of attack:

1. Challenge Whether the Conviction Is Actually “Substantially Similar”

The Coast Guard does not simply rely on the name of the state offense. It must determine whether the elements of the state statute truly match a federal Chapter 109A offense.

This creates a critical legal question:

• Does the state statute require force?
• Does it require lack of consent?
• Does it involve a protected victim category?
• Does it criminalize broader conduct than federal law?

If the state offense is broader than the federal statute, then it may be legally incorrect to treat it as “substantially similar”—and the mandatory bar may not apply.

2. Retroactivity & Due Process Challenges

Many affected mariners were:

• Previously approved by the Coast Guard
• Cleared for service under earlier standards
• Encouraged to invest in training and credentialing

When the government retroactively changes policy and then destroys a career without new misconduct, powerful constitutional due-process and reliance arguments arise. Courts closely scrutinize this type of sudden agency reversal.

3. Administrative Appeal to the Coast Guard Commandant

Even with a mandatory statute, a mariner still has the right to:

• File for reconsideration
• Pursue a formal appeal to the Commandant
• Preserve all legal issues for judicial review

This stage is critical for building the record that will later be reviewed by a federal judge.

4. Federal Court Lawsuit Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)

Once administrative remedies are exhausted, mariners can bring a lawsuit challenging the denial as:

• Arbitrary and capricious
• Contrary to law
• Unconstitutional
• Unsupported by substantial evidence

Federal judges—not the Coast Guard—have the final word on whether an agency has misapplied a statute, violated due process, or exceeded its authority.

Why This Matters to Every Professional Mariner

This issue now affects:

• Mariners with old convictions from their youth
• Mariners previously approved and renewed
• Mariners with spotless employment records
• Union officers and credentialed professionals

The Coast Guard’s new interpretation means a license can be revoked in practical effect decades after the fact—even when the government itself approved the mariner repeatedly under prior standards.

Final Thoughts: These Cases Are No Longer Administrative — They Are Federal Litigation

MMC denials under 46 U.S.C. § 7511(a) are no longer simple reconsideration matters. They now require:

• Statutory interpretation
• Constitutional due-process analysis
• Federal administrative-law litigation strategy

If your MMC has been denied under the Coast Guard’s sex-offense policy, you must shift immediately from administrative defense to federal legal strategy. These deadlines are short, the consequences are permanent, and the legal arguments must be preserved correctly from the very beginning.

Your license is your livelihood. And this is now a federal court fight.

Call Us Now for a Free Consultation

Related Defense & Federal Appeal Resources

• Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) Defense Attorney
• Federal Administrative Appeals & APA Lawsuits
• Security Clearance Denial & Revocation Defense
• Military Administrative Separation Defense