NJP Appeals: When Command Punishment Goes Too Far

Nonjudicial Punishment (NJP) is often treated as “minor discipline,” but the consequences can be career-altering—loss of rank, pay, liberty, and long-term impacts on evaluations and advancement. The good news is that NJP appeals can be highly effective when the command gets the process wrong or the punishment is unjust.

A Real-World NJP Appeal Success: DUI Already Disposed of in Civilian Court

We were recently contacted by a service member who had already resolved a DUI in civilian court, only to later face NJP for similar underlying misconduct. The service member called us because they felt it was unfair to be punished in civilian court and then punished again through command action.

After reviewing the record, we filed an NJP appeal, identified procedural defects, and argued that the punishment was unjust under the circumstances. The appeal was successful and the outcome was corrected.

The 5-Day Issue Under Part V of the MCM: Why Timing Matters

In this case, there was another critical problem: the appeal was not adjudicated within the required timeline. Under Part V of the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), when a service member receives restraint-type punishment (such as restriction or confinement) and submits an appeal, the appeal must be promptly considered. When the command does not act within the required period (commonly 5 days in these situations), continued restraint can become improper.

Because the appeal was not acted on in time, we were able to secure our client’s release for the holidays while the appeal remained pending—allowing the service member to spend time with family while the command’s error was addressed.

How NJP Appeals Work

An NJP appeal is not just a formality. It is an important safeguard that allows a higher authority to correct errors, unfairness, and disproportionate punishment.

1) You Have the Right to Appeal NJP

Service members generally have the right to appeal NJP to the next superior authority. The appeal is a chance to argue that the punishment should be set aside, reduced, or otherwise corrected.

2) Grounds for an NJP Appeal: “Unjust” or “Disproportionate”

Common grounds for an NJP appeal include that the punishment was:

• Unjust (for example, the facts do not support the finding, key evidence was ignored, or the outcome is fundamentally unfair)
• Disproportionate (the punishment is excessive compared to the offense or compared to similar cases)
• Procedurally defective (required rights advisements were missing, improper evidence was used, or the process violated governing rules)

3) Deadlines Are Short—Act Immediately

NJP appeal deadlines are typically very short (often within 5 days of the NJP result, depending on service-specific rules). If you are considering an appeal, you should act quickly to preserve your rights and secure any time-sensitive relief—especially if restriction, extra duty, or confinement is involved.

4) Procedural Errors Often Win Appeals

Some of the most common appeal issues we see include:

• Failure to properly advise the service member of rights
• Improper consideration or exclusion of evidence
• Command bias or improper influence
• Inadequate findings or documentation
• Failure to follow required timelines under the MCM and service regulations

Can the Military Impose NJP After a Civilian Court Case?

Yes, in many situations a command may still pursue NJP even after a civilian disposition. However, the prior civilian outcome is often highly relevant in arguing that additional punishment is unjust or disproportionate, and it can support mitigation—especially when the command’s process is flawed or the command overreaches.

Key Takeaways

• NJP is not always final—a well-supported appeal can correct unjust outcomes.
• Deadlines matter—appeals often must be submitted quickly.
• Procedural defects matter—commands must follow required rules and timelines.
• Civilian disposition matters—it can support mitigation and unfairness arguments.
• Restriction/confinement timelines matter—missed deadlines can justify immediate relief.

Need Help With an NJP Appeal?

If you’re facing NJP, already received NJP, or believe the punishment was unfair or handled improperly, an NJP appeal may be your best opportunity to fix the outcome.

Korody Law, P.A. handles NJP appeals across all military branches. We review the record for procedural defects, develop mitigation and unfairness arguments, and pursue relief quickly—especially when liberty is at stake.

Contact Korody Law, P.A. for a confidential consultation.

NJP Appeals FAQ

What is an NJP appeal?

An NJP appeal is a request for the next superior authority to review the nonjudicial punishment result and correct it if it is unjust or disproportionate. Depending on the service and the case, the appeal may ask the superior authority to set aside the NJP entirely, reduce the punishment, or grant other appropriate relief.

How long do I have to appeal NJP?

Deadlines are short and service-specific. In many cases, the window can be only a few days after imposition or notification of punishment. If you are considering an appeal, act immediately so you can preserve evidence, obtain the paperwork, and submit a complete and persuasive package on time.

What are strong grounds for an NJP appeal?

Strong appeals are evidence-driven and focus on why the result is unjust. Common grounds include lack of reliable evidence, failure to advise required rights, improper consideration of evidence, bias or improper influence, failure to follow required procedures, or punishment that is disproportionate to the alleged misconduct and the service member’s record.

Can I submit documents and statements with my NJP appeal?

Yes. A well-prepared appeal typically includes supporting documentation such as counseling records, evaluations, awards, medical records (when relevant), witness statements, timelines, and any evidence that undermines the basis for the NJP or provides strong mitigation.

Can an NJP be set aside or removed from my record?

In some cases, yes. Depending on the service, the facts, and the errors involved, the superior authority may set aside the NJP (vacating the finding and punishment) or grant other relief. Even where the NJP is not fully set aside, counsel can often pursue reduction of punishment and record-focused strategies to limit long-term career impact.

Do I need a lawyer to appeal NJP?

You are not required to have a lawyer, but the stakes are often career-altering. A lawyer can identify procedural defects, assemble persuasive evidence, draft the appeal with the correct framing, and ensure the appeal is submitted in a way that protects your record and strengthens any follow-on administrative or judicial defense.

How do I contact Korody Law about an NJP appeal?

To request a confidential consultation, visit our contact page or call/text (904) 383-7261.

Disclaimer: This post is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different. Consult an attorney about your specific facts.