ROTC & NROTC Disenrollment Defense Lawyer | Navy, Army, Air Force, Marine-Option | Korody Law
Home Practice Areas ROTC & NROTC Disenrollment Defense
NROTC · Army ROTC · AFROTC · Marine-Option · Nationwide

ROTC & NROTC Disenrollment Defense Lawyer

Navy · Marine-Option · Army · Air Force · Scholarship Repayment · Commission at Stake

A disenrollment action can cost you your scholarship, your commission, and your future career before it has even begun. Korody Law — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN, a retired Navy JAG Captain with 30+ years of military law experience — provides full-scope ROTC disenrollment defense for Navy, Marine-Option, Army, and Air Force cadets and midshipmen nationwide. We attend the hearing. We argue directly to the board. We fight to protect your commission and your future.

Call or Text: (904) 383-7261  ·  Nationwide ROTC Disenrollment Representation
30+Years Military Law Experience (CAPT Crow)
All BranchesNavy · Marine-Option · Army · Air Force
NationwideEvery University Campus & ROTC Program
At the HearingWe Attend & Argue Directly to the Board
⚠ Notified of Disenrollment Proceedings? Early Intervention Is Critical.

The disenrollment process moves quickly and the windows for presenting an effective defense are narrow. Do not attempt to navigate this alone, and do not assume that the outcome is predetermined. Korody Law has successfully defended cadets and midshipmen who appeared to face certain disenrollment. Contact us immediately for a free consultation before your first hearing date.

What Is at Stake — Scholarship, Commission, and Career

ROTC and NROTC disenrollment is one of the most consequential adverse actions a cadet or midshipman can face — not just because of what it takes away today, but because of what it forecloses for the future. The pathway to a commission as an officer in the United States military represents years of work, sacrifice, and investment. Disenrollment ends that pathway abruptly — and adds a substantial financial penalty on top of everything else.

Unlike disciplinary proceedings against active-duty service members, ROTC disenrollment actions occur at a stage when the cadet or midshipman is still a student — often without the procedural protections, institutional knowledge, or support systems available to officers and enlisted members facing disciplinary action. Many cadets and midshipmen facing disenrollment do not realize they have the right to legal representation, do not understand the board process, and do not know how to present the strongest possible case to the people making the decision about their future. That information gap — and the institutional advantage it gives to the ROTC program leadership — is exactly what Korody Law is designed to close.

Loss of Scholarship

ROTC scholarships cover tuition, room and board, and a monthly stipend — often valued at $40,000–$180,000 or more over four years depending on the institution. Disenrollment not only immediately terminates ongoing scholarship benefits but, in many cases, triggers mandatory repayment of scholarship funds already received. That repayment obligation can reach tens of thousands of dollars and must be addressed simultaneously with the disenrollment defense.

Loss of Commission

Disenrollment means loss of the officer commissioning pathway. A cadet or midshipman who is disenrolled cannot be commissioned through ROTC — and the adverse record created by the disenrollment can affect eligibility for alternative commissioning paths (OCS/OTS), federal employment, and security clearances. For a student who has built their educational and career plan around a military commission, disenrollment can require a fundamental reconsideration of every post-graduation plan.

Possible Enlisted Service Obligation

In rare but real circumstances, a disenrolled cadet or midshipman may be required to fulfill their service obligation as an enlisted member rather than an officer — a consequence that is permitted under the terms of some ROTC scholarship contracts. While this option is used infrequently, the possibility adds an additional dimension of consequence to the disenrollment analysis and makes aggressive defense even more important.

Because the consequences are so severe, every disenrollment case must be aggressively defended. Korody Law's attorneys attend the disenrollment hearing, argue directly to the board, present evidence, challenge the basis for the action, and advise the cadet or midshipman throughout the entire process — from the first notification through appeals if necessary.

NROTC Defense Army ROTC AFROTC Marine-Option Scholarship Repayment PRB Defense Commissioning Defense Nationwide

What Triggers ROTC Disenrollment

Disenrollment proceedings can be initiated for a wide range of reasons — academic, physical, conduct-related, medical, or administrative. Understanding the basis of the action against you is the starting point for building the most effective defense. Here are the most common triggers across all branches.

Academic Deficiencies

  • GPA falling below the minimum required standard (typically 2.0 overall or in specific subjects)
  • Failure of a required military science, naval science, or aerospace studies course
  • Repeated academic probation without demonstrated improvement
  • Failure to maintain full-time student status as required by program regulations
  • Academic misconduct — cheating, plagiarism, or honor code violations at the university level that affect ROTC standing

Physical Fitness Failures

  • Navy/Marine-Option: Physical Readiness Test (PRT) or Physical Fitness Test (PFT) failures — failure to meet minimum standards after remediation
  • Army: Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) failures or Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failures
  • Air Force: Fitness Assessment (FA) failures
  • Body composition or weight standard failures that persist despite corrective action
  • Physical fitness failures arising from injury or medical condition — which may be defendable through medical documentation and remediation timelines

Conduct and Disciplinary Issues

  • Honor code violations at the university or within the ROTC unit
  • Alcohol-related incidents — DUI, underage drinking, alcohol-related conduct violations
  • Drug-related incidents — positive drug test results or drug-related arrests
  • Sexual misconduct allegations — ranging from SHARP/Title IX complaints to criminal referrals
  • Insubordination, failure to follow orders, or unauthorized absence from required ROTC events
  • Social media conduct inconsistent with officer standards
  • Off-campus civilian conduct resulting in criminal arrest or conviction

Leadership and Officer Potential Concerns

Leadership and officer potential evaluations are among the most subjective — and most contested — bases for disenrollment. Unlike an objective academic GPA or a physical fitness score, "lack of officer potential" is a judgment call made by ROTC staff officers who may have limited interaction with the cadet or midshipman and who may be influenced by one or two incidents rather than the full record.

  • Poor performance evaluations from ROTC instructors or battalion/unit staff
  • Negative leadership assessment following a training event, field exercise, or summer training program
  • Concerns raised following NROTC summer cruise, Army LDAC/Cadet Summer Training, or Air Force Field Training
  • Documented concerns about maturity, professionalism, or decision-making
  • Negative peer evaluations from other cadets or midshipmen

Officer potential concerns are defendable — but defending them requires a complete record review, identification of bias or procedural irregularities in the evaluation process, and presentation of substantial counter-evidence showing leadership capability, character, and commitment. This is precisely the type of defense that benefits most from experienced ROTC-specific legal representation.

Medical and Administrative Issues

  • Medical conditions that affect commissioning eligibility — including injury, illness, or mental health conditions identified during the program
  • Failure to meet medical standards for commissioning as determined by a military medical review
  • Administrative failures — failure to maintain required documentation, failure to complete required training, or failure to respond to program requirements within deadlines
  • Loss of academic enrollment at the host institution (withdrawal, suspension, or expulsion)
  • Change in citizenship, immigration status, or other eligibility factors

Disenrollment Process by Branch

Each branch of service administers its ROTC program under different regulations, with different board structures, different procedural rules, and different chains of appeal. Understanding which branch's procedures apply — and the specific requirements and opportunities within that process — is essential to building an effective defense.

⚓ Navy ROTC (NROTC)

For Navy and Marine-Option midshipmen, the Performance Review Board (PRB) is the disenrollment board. There is no separate disenrollment board — the PRB serves both functions. Understanding this is critical, because it means the evaluation of performance and the decision about disenrollment happen in the same proceeding.

The PRB is convened by the Professor of Naval Science (PNS) — the commanding officer of the NROTC unit — and typically consists of NROTC staff officers. The board reviews the midshipman's record, hears from witnesses where appropriate, and makes recommendations that may include:

  • Continuation in the program
  • Probation with specified conditions and review timeline
  • Leave of absence
  • Disenrollment — which the PNS then forwards to NSTC (Naval Service Training Command) for final action

Our role: We prepare the full PRB defense package, attend the hearing with or on behalf of the midshipman, argue directly to the board, present supporting evidence and witness testimony, and challenge any procedural irregularities that affected the proceeding.

🦅 Air Force ROTC (AFROTC)

AFROTC uses an investigation and disenrollment recommendation packet process that varies by region and circumstance. Depending on the basis for the action, an in-person hearing may or may not be convened. The disenrollment recommendation is typically initiated at the Detachment level by the Detachment Commander and forwarded to AFROTC Headquarters for review and final decision.

  • Disenrollment actions based on academic or physical fitness failures may be processed administratively without a formal hearing
  • Conduct-related disenrollments typically involve a more formal inquiry process
  • The cadet has the right to submit matters in their own behalf at specified points in the process
  • Appeals from AFROTC disenrollment decisions go to AFROTC Headquarters

Our role: We develop the full response package, identify and challenge procedural errors in the investigation process, coordinate with the Detachment on submission deadlines, and pursue appeals where the initial decision is adverse.

🎖️ Army ROTC (Cadet Command)

Army ROTC uses a formal disenrollment board process governed by Cadet Command regulations. The board evaluates the cadet's performance, conduct, medical condition, and officer potential and makes a recommendation on disenrollment and, critically, on whether the cadet should be required to repay scholarship funds or fulfill an enlisted service obligation.

Army ROTC disenrollment boards typically occur at the Brigade or Battalion level. Key procedural elements include:

  • Written notification of the basis for the proposed disenrollment
  • The cadet's right to submit a written response and supporting materials
  • A formal board hearing where the cadet can present evidence and call witnesses
  • Board recommendations on disenrollment, scholarship recoupment, and enlisted obligation
  • Cadet Command Headquarters review of board recommendations before final action

Our role: We review the full disenrollment packet, develop the hearing defense including witnesses, character submissions, and legal arguments, attend the board with the cadet, and advocate against both disenrollment and scholarship recoupment at the hearing and on appeal.

🦅 Marine-Option NROTC

Marine-Option midshipmen enrolled in NROTC units follow the same PRB process as Navy midshipmen at the unit level, but Marine-Option disenrollment actions also involve review by Marine Corps Officials — including possible input from the Marine Corps Recruiting Command — given the specific officer accession pipeline implications for the Marine Corps.

Physical fitness standards for Marine-Option midshipmen are the Marine Corps PFT standards — typically more demanding than Navy PRT standards — and PFT failures or body composition failures are among the most common triggers for Marine-Option PRB convening. The Marine Corps also applies more stringent officer candidate character and conduct standards to Marine-Option midshipmen, making conduct-based disenrollments particularly consequential.

  • Same PRB process as Navy NROTC at the unit level
  • Marine Corps physical fitness standards apply (PFT, CFT, body composition)
  • Marine officer commissioning eligibility determination in parallel with NROTC review
  • Appeals through NSTC with Marine Corps input on commissioning eligibility

Scholarship Repayment — Understanding the Financial Exposure

One of the least understood — and most financially devastating — aspects of ROTC disenrollment is the scholarship repayment obligation. A cadet or midshipman who accepted an ROTC scholarship signed a contract committing to military service in exchange for scholarship benefits. Disenrollment from the program can trigger a repayment obligation for all scholarship funds received during the program. For a student who has received multiple years of scholarship support, this obligation can be substantial — in some cases exceeding $50,000–$100,000.

What Repayment Covers

ROTC scholarship repayment obligations typically cover tuition payments made directly to the institution, room and board stipends paid to the cadet or midshipman, the monthly living stipend, and book and supply allowances. The total recoupment amount is calculated based on what was actually paid — and in four-year scholarships at private institutions, this can be extremely large.

When Repayment Can Be Waived

Scholarship repayment is not always required upon disenrollment. The basis for disenrollment matters significantly — disenrollment for medical reasons, for reasons beyond the cadet's control, or where the board finds that disenrollment is in the best interest of the government rather than due to misconduct may result in waiver of the repayment obligation. The board's characterization of the basis for disenrollment directly affects the repayment determination, which is why how the disenrollment case is litigated matters for financial reasons as much as for commissioning reasons.

Enlisted Alternative to Repayment

In some cases, a disenrolled cadet or midshipman can satisfy their scholarship obligation by enlisting in the active duty military rather than repaying the scholarship funds. Whether this option is available and on what terms depends on the branch, the basis for disenrollment, and the cadet's individual circumstances. For some disenrolled cadets, this option provides a pathway to continued military service even after the commissioning pathway is closed. We analyze this option in every case where it may be available.

Critical strategy point: The characterization of the disenrollment — the specific basis and findings documented by the board — determines the repayment obligation. A defense that successfully frames the disenrollment as medical or administrative rather than conduct-based, or that demonstrates the action was in the government's interest rather than caused by the cadet's misconduct, can eliminate or substantially reduce the repayment requirement. This is why every disenrollment defense must address both the commissioning and the financial dimensions simultaneously.

How Korody Law Defends ROTC Disenrollment Cases

Our approach to ROTC disenrollment defense is comprehensive, systematic, and aggressive. We treat every disenrollment case as the serious proceeding it is — with consequences that will define the cadet's or midshipman's professional life for years to come. Here is how we build and present the defense.

  1. Immediate Case Assessment

    We review all available documentation immediately — counseling records, performance evaluations, fitness test results, academic transcripts, incident reports, and any communications from the ROTC unit related to the disenrollment action. We identify the specific regulatory basis for the action, the procedural timeline, and the critical deadlines for submitting the defense response. Early identification of procedural errors — missed notification requirements, improper hearing composition, inadequate opportunity to respond — can be grounds for challenging the entire proceeding.

  2. Evidence Development and Preparation

    We build the defense evidence package from scratch — not relying on what the unit has already assembled. This includes gathering character letters from commanding officers, professors, coaches, mentors, and peers; developing academic documentation that provides context for GPA issues; creating a detailed fitness remediation timeline for physical fitness cases; assembling supporting documentation for medical issues; and identifying any institutional failures or procedural irregularities that contributed to the situation. A well-developed evidence package demonstrates both the cadet's potential and the weaknesses in the basis for the disenrollment.

  3. Legal Analysis — Challenging the Basis for Action

    Every disenrollment has a regulatory basis that must be satisfied before the action can proceed. We analyze whether the specific facts alleged actually meet the regulatory standard for disenrollment, whether the proper procedures were followed at every step, whether the cadet or midshipman was given adequate notice and opportunity to respond, and whether any procedural irregularities materially affected the fairness of the proceeding. Legal challenges to the basis and procedure for the disenrollment are raised as affirmative arguments — not as technicalities, but as substantive defenses that can change the outcome.

  4. Hearing Preparation and Presentation

    Our attorneys attend the PRB, disenrollment board, or hearing and argue directly to the board members. We present the defense evidence, examine supporting witnesses, challenge the reliability of negative evaluations, and cross-examine adverse witnesses where permitted by the applicable procedures. The board members who make the recommendation are ROTC staff officers — our attorney's presence and advocacy changes how the proceeding is conducted and how the board evaluates the evidence. We also prepare the cadet or midshipman to present their own statement effectively and confidently.

  5. Mitigation — Arguing for the Best Possible Outcome

    Even where the basis for the disenrollment proceeding is factually supported, effective mitigation can change the outcome — from disenrollment to probation, from disenrollment with repayment to disenrollment without repayment, or from a negative board characterization to a favorable one. We develop a comprehensive mitigation case that presents the cadet's or midshipman's full record, demonstrates genuine commitment to improvement, shows the isolated nature of the issue, and argues for the most favorable possible disposition.

  6. Appeals — When the Board's Decision Is Adverse

    If the board recommends disenrollment or the program leadership takes adverse action, we pursue every available appeal pathway — to NSTC, Cadet Command, AFROTC Headquarters, university scholarship offices, and, in appropriate cases, federal administrative review. The appeals process gives a second opportunity to present the defense with the benefit of knowing what the board found and why — and experienced appellate advocacy in the military administrative context can sometimes produce a reversal of an initial adverse decision.

Attorney Expertise — CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN

RC

CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN

Retired Navy JAG Captain · O-6 · 30+ Years Military Law

CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow is a retired Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps Captain — an O-6 with over 30 years of active-duty military law experience. During his career, CAPT Crow served as a senior Navy JAG officer, advising commanding officers on military law, personnel actions, officer evaluations, and administrative proceedings across the full spectrum of military justice and military administrative law.

That experience is precisely what makes CAPT Crow uniquely effective in ROTC and NROTC disenrollment cases. The board members making recommendations about a cadet's or midshipman's future are Navy, Marine Corps, Army, or Air Force officers — officers who evaluate performance, character, and leadership through the lens of their own military experience. CAPT Crow speaks that language. He understands how these officers think about officer potential, what genuine rehabilitation looks like to a military evaluation board, and how to present a case that resonates with the people making the decision.

CAPT Crow has provided disenrollment defense nationally — traveling to university campuses across the country to appear in person at PRBs and disenrollment boards. His presence at a hearing — a retired Navy Captain advocating for the cadet or midshipman — commands attention from ROTC staff in a way that no junior attorney or civilian advocate can replicate.

Why a Retired O-6 Makes the Difference

  • Board members are typically junior or mid-grade officers (O-3 to O-5). A retired O-6 carries institutional authority that changes the dynamic of the proceeding
  • CAPT Crow's understanding of how officer evaluation reports are written, how officer potential is assessed, and what commanding officers look for in junior officers allows us to frame defense arguments in terms that resonate with the board
  • Deep familiarity with Navy and Marine Corps regulations governing NROTC — the specific provisions that determine whether the disenrollment action was properly initiated and whether the board process was correctly followed
  • National experience with disenrollment proceedings across every branch — including the specific procedural customs at different NROTC units, Army ROTC battalions, and AFROTC detachments that vary by installation and region

Nationwide Representation

ROTC programs are located at universities across the country — from flagship state universities to private institutions, from large urban campuses to small liberal arts colleges. Disenrollment boards and PRBs are held wherever the unit is located.

Korody Law's ROTC disenrollment defense practice is genuinely national. We travel to the location of the proceeding — whether that is in Florida, California, New York, Texas, or anywhere else — because appearing in person at the hearing is how you change outcomes. Remote submission of materials without attorney appearance at the hearing leaves the most powerful advocacy tool unused.

If you or your cadet is facing disenrollment proceedings at any ROTC program in the country, contact us immediately. Distance is not an obstacle to effective representation.

Appeals to Higher Authorities

A negative board recommendation is not the final word. Every ROTC branch maintains an appellate review process — a pathway to challenge an adverse initial determination through a more senior authority. Appeals in disenrollment cases require a different approach than the initial hearing: the defense now knows what the board found, what evidence it relied on, and where the process may have fallen short. Effective appellate advocacy uses that information to build the strongest possible case for reversal.

Appeals Pathways by Branch

  • Navy / Marine-Option (NROTC): Appeals from PRB disenrollment recommendations go to the Naval Service Training Command (NSTC) in Pensacola, Florida. NSTC reviews the full record and the board's recommendation before final action is taken. A well-crafted appeal to NSTC — presenting legal error, procedural irregularity, or substantial new evidence — can result in modification or reversal of the disenrollment recommendation.
  • Army ROTC: Appeals from disenrollment board decisions go to Cadet Command headquarters. Cadet Command has authority to approve, modify, or disapprove the board's recommendation. Army ROTC appeals must address both the substantive basis for the disenrollment and the scholarship recoupment determination.
  • Air Force ROTC: AFROTC disenrollment decisions are reviewed at AFROTC Headquarters. Cadets have the right to submit matters in their own behalf at specified points in the review process, and final decisions are made by AFROTC/CC (the Commandant).
  • University scholarship offices: In cases where a university-controlled scholarship component is at issue, concurrent appeals to the university's scholarship office or financial aid administration can preserve academic funding while the military portion of the appeal is pending.

What Makes an Effective Appeal

An appeal is not simply a repeat of the initial hearing submission. It is a focused, disciplined argument that identifies specific errors in the board's process or findings and presents compelling reasons — based on the actual record — why the initial recommendation was wrong. Effective appeals in disenrollment cases typically address:

  • Procedural error: Failure to provide proper notice, improper board composition, denial of the right to present evidence or witnesses, failure to follow applicable regulations in the conduct of the proceeding
  • Factual error: The board's findings are not supported by the evidence in the record, or the board ignored significant favorable evidence that was presented
  • Legal error: The applicable regulation does not support the disenrollment on the facts found by the board, or the board applied the wrong standard
  • New evidence: Evidence that became available after the board but that materially changes the factual picture — improved fitness test results, academic improvement, completion of counseling or rehabilitation
  • Disproportion: Even where disenrollment may be technically supportable, a strong argument that the consequence is disproportionate to the conduct — particularly for first-offense or isolated incidents — can sometimes produce a modification to a less severe outcome

Your Commission Is Worth Fighting For. Let Us Fight.

Korody Law — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN — has successfully defended NROTC, Army ROTC, and AFROTC cadets and midshipmen facing disenrollment across the country. We attend the hearing. We argue your case. We fight for your future. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Yes. While you do not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel at an ROTC administrative proceeding — these are not criminal proceedings — you have the right to retain your own civilian attorney to represent and advise you throughout the disenrollment process, including at the hearing or PRB. ROTC regulations permit the appearance of an attorney on behalf of the cadet or midshipman, and our attorneys routinely appear in person at PRBs and disenrollment boards to argue directly to the board. The presence of experienced legal counsel changes how the proceeding is conducted and how the board evaluates the case.
  • Yes — in many cases. The existence of a factual basis for disenrollment does not mean that disenrollment is the inevitable outcome. ROTC boards have discretion to recommend probation, remediation, or continuation rather than disenrollment where the evidence supports it. Effective advocacy — presenting a compelling case for the cadet's potential, demonstrating genuine rehabilitation, showing that the underlying issue is isolated and has been addressed, and arguing that the cadet's interests and the military's interests both favor continuation — can persuade a board to exercise that discretion favorably. We have achieved continuation and probation outcomes in cases where disenrollment initially appeared certain.
  • Not necessarily — the repayment obligation depends on the basis for disenrollment and the characterization of the action by the board. Disenrollment due to medical reasons or factors beyond the cadet's control often results in waiver of the repayment obligation. Disenrollment due to conduct or misconduct is more likely to trigger repayment. The board's characterization of the basis for disenrollment directly determines the repayment outcome, which is why fighting for the most favorable characterization — even when some adverse action cannot be avoided — is critically important for financial reasons. We address the repayment dimension in every disenrollment defense we handle.
  • For Navy and Marine-Option NROTC, the Performance Review Board (PRB) is the disenrollment board — the same proceeding performs both functions. There is no separate disenrollment board. The PRB reviews overall performance and can recommend continuation, probation, leave of absence, or disenrollment in the same hearing. This is an important distinction because it means that the defense strategy must be built for the PRB from the outset — there is no separate opportunity to appear before a different body before the disenrollment recommendation is made. For Army and Air Force ROTC, the processes are somewhat different and involve separate stages.
  • Yes. Every ROTC branch maintains an appeals process — to NSTC (Navy/Marine-Option), Cadet Command (Army), or AFROTC Headquarters (Air Force). Appeals must typically be submitted within specified deadlines and must be based on procedural error, factual error, legal error, or new evidence not available at the time of the initial hearing. Appeals in disenrollment cases can sometimes produce reversals or modifications of the initial adverse decision, particularly where the appeal identifies specific procedural irregularities or presents new evidence of rehabilitation that was not available when the board met. We assist with appeals in cases we did not originally handle as well.
  • Yes. Korody Law's ROTC disenrollment practice is genuinely national. Our attorneys — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow — travel to the location of the hearing to appear in person at PRBs and disenrollment boards wherever they are held. ROTC programs exist at hundreds of universities across the country, and we have appeared at institutions from coast to coast. If you are facing disenrollment proceedings at any ROTC program in the United States, contact us regardless of your location. Distance is not an obstacle to effective representation.
  • Potentially yes, depending on the circumstances. Officer Candidate School (OCS) for the Navy and Marine Corps, Officer Training School (OTS) for the Air Force, and WOCS for the Army provide alternative paths to commissioning that are independent of ROTC. However, a disenrollment record — particularly a disenrollment for conduct or character concerns — can affect eligibility for these programs and will be evaluated as part of any subsequent commissioning application. How the disenrollment is characterized in the official record matters significantly for future commissioning options, which is another reason why fighting for the most favorable possible characterization in the disenrollment proceeding itself is so important.

Your Future as an Officer. Defend It Now.

Korody Law — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN — has defended Navy, Marine-Option, Army, and Air Force ROTC cadets and midshipmen at disenrollment hearings and PRBs across the country. We appear at the hearing. We argue your case. We protect your commission, your scholarship, and your future. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.

Korody Law, P.A.  ·  Jacksonville, FL  ·  Nationwide ROTC Disenrollment Defense